All regulations
● Open text · reproducible
D.M. 236/1989

Technical requirements for the accessibility of private buildings

In forceAccessibilitàLegge/DecretoCogenteVerified

Summary

TAV. 00

Implementing decree of Law 13/1989: it sets the technical requirements that guarantee accessibility, adaptability and visitability in private and publicly-funded residential buildings. It defines the three levels of spatial quality and the dimensional parameters (ramps, doors, manoeuvring spaces, bathrooms, lifts) for the overcoming and removal of architectural barriers.

Scope of application

TAV. 01

It applies to private buildings and to publicly-subsidised residential buildings, both new construction and renovations (including partial ones). For public buildings and spaces the equivalent technical requirements are set by Presidential Decree 503/1996. The criteria are today referenced by the Consolidated Building Act (D.P.R. 380/2001, arts. 77-82).

In depth

TAV. A

Three levels of spatial quality

The decree does not impose a single standard; it grades the quality of the built space on three increasing levels. The choice depends on the intended use and on the type of works: a newly-built private dwelling must guarantee at least visitability and adaptability, while common areas and publicly-funded housing aim for full accessibility.

The three grades of spatial quality
Adaptability
Visitability
Accessibility
minimum grademaximum grade

Visitability: the level required most often

Visitability ensures that a person with reduced or impaired mobility can reach the social spaces — living and dining area — and at least one bathroom of the dwelling. It is the typical requirement for new homes: not the whole unit must be accessible, but the social core and one bathroom must be.

The recurring dimensional parameters

The requirements come down to a few key measurements that the designer checks systematically along the path of use, from the entrance to the internal spaces.

Key reference measurements
ElementReference parameter
Wheelchair rotationØ 1.50 m
Main door (clear width)≥ 0.80 m
Internal doors (clear width)≥ 0.75 m
Ramp — slope≤ 8%
Ramp — width≥ 0.90 m
Threshold / level change≤ 2.5 cm
Corridor / passage≥ 1.00 m
Lift car (accessibility)1.40 × 1.10 m, door ≥ 0.80 m
Editorial summary of the values of D.M. 236/1989, for information.

How a design's conformity is checked

Verification path
  1. 01
    Identify the required levelEstablish whether accessibility, visitability or adaptability is needed, based on the intended use and the type of works.
  2. 02
    Check the routesReview horizontal and vertical routes: ramps, lifts, stairs, level changes and thresholds.
  3. 03
    Check the internal spacesManoeuvring spaces, clear door widths, usability of the bathroom with transfer space.
  4. 04
    Produce drawings and declarationProduce the drawings and the declaration of conformity required by Law 13/1989, attached to the building permit.

Key points

TAV. K
  • Three levels of quality: accessibility (highest), visitability (partial), adaptability (deferred over time).
  • Manoeuvring space for wheelchair rotation: minimum diameter 1.50 m.
  • Ramps: maximum 8% slope, minimum width 0.90 m, resting landings along the route.
  • Doors: minimum clear width 0.80 m for the main entrance, 0.75 m for internal doors.
  • Thresholds and level changes no greater than 2.5 cm; beyond that they are bridged with ramps.
  • Law 13/1989 requires a design signed by a qualified professional and a declaration of conformity to the decree's parameters.

State-exam tracks that call it into play

TAV. E

Where this rule shows up in past architect qualification exams — study the rule, not just the theme.

2025 · I sess.Two themes: a commons with temporary structures, an attic recoveryPolitecnico di Torino · in review2025 · II sess.Change of use of a former courtyard carpentry workshop into housingPolitecnico di Torino · in review2025 · I sess.New residential building on a corner lot, in dialogue with a listed buildingPolitecnico di Torino · in review2025 · I sess.Three themes: terraced house, detached villa, town hall with squareUniversità "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara · in review2025 · II sess.Two themes: two-family villa with courtyard, small block on pilotisUniversità "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara · in review2025 · I sess.Three themes: a public pavilion, an ex-barn recovery, the ex-Mercafir masterplanUniversità degli Studi di Firenze · in review2025 · II sess.Three themes: a neighbourhood library, a Tuscan ex-barn, the Soccorso district in PratoUniversità degli Studi di Firenze · in review2025 · I sess.Single-family house in an agricultural zone (new build)Università di Bologna2025 · II sess.nZEB two-family house in a consolidated urban area in ModenaUniversità di Bologna2024 · I sess.Two themes: temporary housing for the Besta hospital, recovery of a courtyard farmsteadPolitecnico di Milano · in review2024 · I sess.Two themes: merging two dwellings, a demountable kiosk in a historic squarePolitecnico di Torino · in review2024 · I sess.Two themes: riverside residential buildings, multifunctional public buildingPolitecnico di Torino · in review2024 · II sess.Two themes: mixed craft-residence building, an office/production buildingPolitecnico di Torino · in review2024 · I sess.Three themes: rural residence, exhibition space, media libraryUniversità "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara2024 · II sess.Four themes: a Francigena centre, a lighthouse restoration, a historic house, a Sorano recovery planUniversità degli Studi di Firenze · in review2024 · I sess.Four themes: a house on the Francigena, tower ruins, a Belvedere pavilion, an urban blockUniversità degli Studi di Firenze · in review2024 · II sess.Two themes: a detached house on a lot, the urban recovery of a square in TriesteUniversità degli Studi di Trieste · in review2024 · I sess.Two themes: an apartment on Piazza Ponterosso, a beach establishment at GradoUniversità degli Studi di Trieste · in review2024 · II sess.Single-family house in an agricultural zoneUniversità di Bologna2019 · I sess.Three themes: retail building, adaptive reuse, urban-planning districtUniversità "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara · in review2019 · I sess.Two themes: the reuse of a mountain building, a confectionery-company outlet in FriuliUniversità degli Studi di Trieste · in review2019 · I sess.The school complex: primary school, gym, canteenUniversità di Bologna · in review2019 · II sess.Three spaces for the town: an artist's house, a fortress lift, a terraced hotelUniversità di Bologna · in review2018 · II sess.Three themes: a coastal observatory, “growing houses”, the Pinerolo market canopyUniversità degli Studi di Genova · in review2018 · I sess.Three single-family houses: terraced, on a steep slope, with a patioUniversità di Bologna · in review2018 · II sess.Three themes: an atelier in a former depot, a porticoed infill, a student houseUniversità di Bologna · in review2017 · I sess.Three themes: a Sampierdarena transformation district, a civic library, a rural recoveryUniversità degli Studi di Genova · in review2017 · I sess.Three residential types: terraced, block, patio housesUniversità di Bologna · in review2017 · II sess.Three recoveries: a neighbourhood hall, a farmhouse B&B, a civic hall on the squareUniversità di Bologna · in review2016 · II sess.Three themes: attic reuse, a retail complex, housing on a slope in ImperiaUniversità degli Studi di Genova · in review2016 · I sess.Three residential building types: terraced, in-line, gallery-accessUniversità di Bologna · in review2016 · II sess.Three refurbishments: a library-playroom, a social centre, a farm-stayUniversità di Bologna · in review2015 · I sess.One site, three projects: a library, a housing complex, an urban study on the ex-AMT depotUniversità degli Studi di Genova · in review2014 · I sess.Three themes: housing at Sestri Levante, a farm-stay to recover, a residential implementation planUniversità degli Studi di Genova · in review2013 · I sess.Three themes: a town hall from a villa, a farm-stay house in the Apennines, an accessible flatUniversità degli Studi di Genova · in review2013 · II sess.Three themes: a shop-and-housing block, a food market, a brewery in a harbour warehouseUniversità degli Studi di Genova · in review2013 · II sess.Three themes: housing over shops, a neighbourhood culture centre, a public sports areaUniversità della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (Aversa) · in review2013 · I sess.House-workshop: a dwelling and a work space over a duplexUniversità della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (Aversa) · in review2009 · I sess.Real architecture competitions as exam themesUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II · in review2008 · I sess.Three themes: a clifftop church, a park with an open-air theatre, a neighbourhood civic centreUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II · in review2007 · I sess.Spaces of dialogue: a hall for faiths, a rural recovery, a multi-ethnic neighbourhoodUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II · in review2007 · I sess.An in-line residential building with shops on the ground floorUniversità della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (Aversa) · in review

Frequently asked questions

TAV. Q
What is the difference between accessibility, visitability and adaptability?

They are three increasing levels. Accessibility is full, safe and autonomous use of spaces and fixtures. Visitability guarantees access to social spaces and at least one bathroom. Adaptability is the possibility of making the space accessible later, with limited works.

When is visitability enough and when is full accessibility required?

It depends on the intended use. New residential units must, as a rule, guarantee visitability and adaptability; building common areas, public housing and many premises open to the public require full accessibility instead. The designer identifies the level case by case.

Does D.M. 236/1989 also apply to renovations?

Yes, including partial renovations. On existing buildings the adaptability criterion applies, and alternative solutions or reasoned exemptions are allowed when strict compliance is technically impossible, provided an equivalent level of usability is ensured.

What is the declaration of conformity required by Law 13/1989?

It is the certification by which the designer attests that the design complies with the requirements of D.M. 236/1989. Without it, the building permit and the certificate of occupancy cannot be obtained: it is the main tool for enforcing the rule.

What is the maximum allowed slope for a ramp?

In general 8%. Steeper slopes are allowed only for short sections, according to a length-to-slope ratio, and horizontal resting landings are required along the route and at every change of direction.

Does the decree also apply to public buildings?

For public buildings and spaces, Presidential Decree 503/1996 applies; it sets equivalent technical requirements and refers to the same criteria as D.M. 236/1989. The two measures share the same framework and dimensional parameters.

Glossary

TAV. G
Barriera architettonica
Physical or perceptual obstacle that limits mobility or the safe and autonomous use of spaces, in particular for people with reduced or impaired motor or sensory ability.
Accessibilità
Possibility of reaching the building and its units, entering them easily and using their spaces and fixtures in conditions of adequate safety and autonomy. It is the highest level of quality.
Visitabilità
Possibility of accessing the social spaces and at least one bathroom of a unit. It is an intermediate level, typical of new dwellings.
Adattabilità
Possibility of modifying the built space over time, at limited cost, to make it fully accessible to people with reduced or impaired mobility.
Spazio di manovra
Free area needed for wheelchair manoeuvres; a minimum diameter of 1.50 m is assumed for a full rotation.
PEBA
Plan for the Elimination of Architectural Barriers: the tool by which municipalities schedule, over time, the upgrading of existing public buildings and spaces.